CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.672 > 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.065 < 0.674 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.556 > 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 < 0.837
Total TP 515 > 467
Total TN 191392 < 191466
Total FP 176 > 145
Total FP CONTRA 28 > 20
Total FP INCONS 89 > 71
Total FP COMP 59 > 54
Total FN 412 < 460
P-value 1.51363754408e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 515
Total TN 191392
Total FP 176
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 59
Total FN 412
Total Scores
MCC 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.556
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3GX2_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 24 4342 6 0 5 1 16
3IVN_B 0.65 0.45 0.93 14 2331 1 1 0 0 17
3IZ4_A 0.69 0.55 0.88 72 70794 11 3 7 1 60
3IZF_C 0.67 0.57 0.79 31 6864 9 1 7 1 23
3JYV_7 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.38 0.30 0.48 10 12225 21 3 8 10 23
3JYX_3 0.58 0.56 0.60 15 6303 21 1 9 11 12
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3NPB_A 0.69 0.59 0.82 27 6988 9 2 4 3 19
3O58_2 0.79 0.79 0.79 30 7222 10 4 4 2 8
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 19 2 6 11 23
3PDR_A 0.73 0.63 0.87 45 12828 9 2 5 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 467
Total TN 191466
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 460
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.837
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3GX2_A 0.74 0.55 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.47 0.32 0.69 42 70815 23 6 13 4 90
3IZF_C 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 6871 1 0 1 0 23
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 26 4 15 7 23
3JYX_3 0.58 0.44 0.75 12 6312 11 0 4 7 15
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.68 0.48 0.96 22 6998 4 1 0 3 24
3O58_2 0.79 0.71 0.87 27 7229 5 2 2 1 11
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 18 2 8 8 23
3PDR_A 0.70 0.53 0.93 38 12839 5 0 3 2 34
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.