CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.525 > 0.232
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.132 > 0.195 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.350 > 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.792 > 0.563
Total TP 324 > 90
Total TN 191615 < 191864
Total FP 110 > 72
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 4
Total FP INCONS 72 > 66
Total FP COMP 25 > 2
Total FN 603 < 837
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 324
Total TN 191615
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 603
Total Scores
MCC 0.525
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.350
Positive Predictive Value 0.792
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2906 3 0 3 0 11
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3GX2_A 0.39 0.28 0.55 11 4351 10 0 9 1 29
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70876 0 0 0 0 132
3IZF_C 0.73 0.63 0.85 34 6863 7 1 5 1 20
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3JYX_3 0.56 0.56 0.58 15 6302 23 1 10 12 12
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.30 0.24 0.39 11 6993 18 1 16 1 35
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 12 3 6 3 9
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 191864
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 837
Total Scores
MCC 0.232
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.195 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.563
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2848 3 1 1 1 17
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2845 5 0 5 0 27
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2924 2 0 2 0 28
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3GX2_A 0.36 0.15 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 34
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3IZ4_A 0.21 0.08 0.59 10 70859 7 0 7 0 122
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6898 5 0 5 0 54
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 32
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12241 5 0 5 0 33
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6323 5 1 4 0 27
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7017 4 0 4 0 46
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7257 3 0 3 0 38
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12872 8 0 8 0 72
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.