CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MaxExpect & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MaxExpect Murlet(20)
MCC 0.598 > 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.085 < 0.598 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.520 > 0.440
Positive Predictive Value 0.692 < 0.801
Total TP 476 > 403
Total TN 190930 < 191115
Total FP 278 > 128
Total FP CONTRA 29 > 13
Total FP INCONS 183 > 87
Total FP COMP 66 > 28
Total FN 440 < 513
P-value 0.000361978838932

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MaxExpect and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MaxExpect and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 476
Total TN 190930
Total FP 278
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 183
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 440
Total Scores
MCC 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.520
Positive Predictive Value 0.692
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.54 0.46 0.64 61 70781 39 3 31 5 71
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 1 6 0 21
3JYV_7 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 2832 8 0 8 0 22
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 34 4 18 12 23
3JYX_3 0.64 0.63 0.65 17 6302 19 1 8 10 10
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.71 0.61 0.82 28 6987 9 0 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 35 2 20 13 23
3O58_2 0.75 0.76 0.74 29 7221 11 3 7 1 9
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 4 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 403
Total TN 191115
Total FP 128
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 87
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 513
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.440
Positive Predictive Value 0.801
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.41 0.41 0.41 7 2833 12 6 4 2 10
2XQD_Y 0.80 0.70 0.90 19 2829 2 0 2 0 8
3A2K_C 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 2 0 2 0 9
3AMU_B 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2983 3 0 2 1 9
3GX2_A 0.61 0.38 1.00 15 4356 1 0 0 1 25
3IVN_B 0.69 0.48 1.00 15 2331 0 0 0 0 16
3IZ4_A 0.40 0.24 0.65 32 70827 21 1 16 4 100
3IZF_C 0.71 0.56 0.91 30 6870 4 0 3 1 24
3JYV_7 0.67 0.53 0.85 17 2830 3 0 3 0 15
3JYX_4 0.36 0.27 0.47 9 12227 15 0 10 5 24
3JYX_3 0.60 0.52 0.70 14 6308 11 0 6 5 13
3LA5_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 16 2469 0 0 0 0 18
3NPB_A 0.55 0.35 0.89 16 7003 2 1 1 0 30
3O58_3 0.33 0.23 0.47 8 12386 12 2 7 3 27
3O58_2 0.89 0.82 0.97 31 7228 2 0 1 1 7
3PDR_A 0.70 0.53 0.93 38 12839 3 0 3 0 34
3RKF_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 16 2195 0 0 0 0 18
3SD1_A 0.68 0.57 0.83 24 3887 5 1 4 0 18
4A1C_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 22 7114 4 0 4 0 32
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.20 5 11756 24 2 18 4 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 23 4347 2 0 1 1 19
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.