CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MaxExpect & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MaxExpect Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.556 > 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.157 > 0.461 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.476 > 0.266
Positive Predictive Value 0.656 < 0.826
Total TP 238 > 133
Total TN 79809 < 80011
Total FP 168 > 32
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 5
Total FP INCONS 109 > 23
Total FP COMP 43 > 4
Total FN 262 < 367
P-value 7.44715536483e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MaxExpect and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 238
Total TN 79809
Total FP 168
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 109
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 262
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.476
Positive Predictive Value 0.656
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 34 4 18 12 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.71 0.61 0.82 28 6987 9 0 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 35 2 20 13 23
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 4 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 80011
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 367
Total Scores
MCC 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.461 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.266
Positive Predictive Value 0.826
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.