CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.445 > 0.443
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.438 ± 0.174 > 0.409 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.385 > 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.522 < 0.547
Total TP 154 > 146
Total TN 51782 < 51810
Total FP 149 > 130
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 15
Total FP INCONS 129 > 106
Total FP COMP 8 < 9
Total FN 246 < 254
P-value 0.0739904251478

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 154
Total TN 51782
Total FP 149
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 129
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 246
Total Scores
MCC 0.445
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.438 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.385
Positive Predictive Value 0.522
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.51 0.46 0.58 18 6074 13 2 11 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 10 0 10 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.26 0.24 0.30 8 6189 21 0 19 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3U4M_B - 0.73 0.57 0.95 21 3138 1 0 1 0 16
3UZL_B 0.45 0.41 0.52 15 3541 14 0 14 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 146
Total TN 51810
Total FP 130
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 254
Total Scores
MCC 0.443
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.409 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.