CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) McQFold
MCC 0.540 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.172 < 0.598 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.456 > 0.452
Positive Predictive Value 0.647 > 0.619
Total TP 123 > 122
Total TN 34833 > 34826
Total FP 74 < 83
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 8
Total FP INCONS 60 < 67
Total FP COMP 7 < 8
Total FN 147 < 148
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and McQFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and McQFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 34833
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 147
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.647
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 34826
Total FP 83
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 148
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.452
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.75 0.59 0.94 16 2986 3 0 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.60 0.86 25 3887 4 0 4 0 17
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.