CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.685 > 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.110 < 0.682 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.528 < 0.553
Positive Predictive Value 0.893 > 0.796
Total TP 216 < 226
Total TN 58156 > 58114
Total FP 33 < 73
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 11
Total FP INCONS 23 < 47
Total FP COMP 7 < 15
Total FN 193 > 183
P-value 2.35850794473e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 216
Total TN 58156
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 193
Total Scores
MCC 0.685
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.893
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.80 0.70 0.90 19 2829 2 0 2 0 8
3AMU_B 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2983 3 0 2 1 9
3IZF_C 0.71 0.56 0.91 30 6870 4 0 3 1 24
3O58_2 0.89 0.82 0.97 31 7228 2 0 1 1 7
3O58_3 0.33 0.23 0.47 8 12386 12 2 7 3 27
3PDR_A 0.70 0.53 0.93 38 12839 3 0 3 0 34
3RKF_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 16 2195 0 0 0 0 18
3SD1_A 0.68 0.57 0.83 24 3887 5 1 4 0 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 23 4347 2 0 1 1 19
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 226
Total TN 58114
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.553
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.