CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Pknots
MCC 0.618 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.071 > 0.592 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.467 < 0.487
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.605
Total TP 398 < 415
Total TN 128045 > 127843
Total FP 110 < 307
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 50
Total FP INCONS 73 < 221
Total FP COMP 24 < 36
Total FN 454 > 437
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 398
Total TN 128045
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 454
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.467
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 401 0 0 0 0 6
2WRQ_Y 0.41 0.41 0.41 7 2833 12 6 4 2 10
2XQD_Y 0.80 0.70 0.90 19 2829 2 0 2 0 8
3A2K_C 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 2 0 2 0 9
3AMU_B 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2983 3 0 2 1 9
3G4S_9 0.58 0.39 0.88 22 7356 3 1 2 0 35
3GX2_A 0.61 0.38 1.00 15 4356 1 0 0 1 25
3IVN_B 0.69 0.48 1.00 15 2331 0 0 0 0 16
3IZF_C 0.71 0.56 0.91 30 6870 4 0 3 1 24
3JYV_7 0.67 0.53 0.85 17 2830 3 0 3 0 15
3JYX_3 0.60 0.52 0.70 14 6308 11 0 6 5 13
3JYX_4 0.36 0.27 0.47 9 12227 15 0 10 5 24
3LA5_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 16 2469 0 0 0 0 18
3NPB_A 0.55 0.35 0.89 16 7003 2 1 1 0 30
3O58_2 0.89 0.82 0.97 31 7228 2 0 1 1 7
3O58_3 0.33 0.23 0.47 8 12386 12 2 7 3 27
3PDR_A 0.70 0.53 0.93 38 12839 3 0 3 0 34
3RKF_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 16 2195 0 0 0 0 18
3SD1_A 0.68 0.57 0.83 24 3887 5 1 4 0 18
4A1C_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 22 7114 4 0 4 0 32
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.20 5 11756 24 2 18 4 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 23 4347 2 0 1 1 19
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 415
Total TN 127843
Total FP 307
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 221
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 437
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.592 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.487
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.45 0.43 0.48 12 2901 13 2 11 0 16
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3G4S_9 0.25 0.21 0.31 12 7342 27 0 27 0 45
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.55 16 4342 14 1 12 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 0 1 0 11
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_3 0.34 0.37 0.31 10 6296 24 9 13 2 17
3JYX_4 0.18 0.21 0.16 7 12203 41 13 23 5 26
3LA5_A 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 2463 0 0 0 0 12
3NPB_A 0.76 0.67 0.86 31 6985 8 1 4 3 15
3O58_2 0.83 0.74 0.93 28 7230 3 0 2 1 10
3O58_3 0.27 0.31 0.24 11 12357 38 11 24 3 24
3PDR_A 0.54 0.44 0.65 32 12831 19 0 17 2 40
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.