CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.346 > 0.125
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.374 ± 0.176 > 0.078 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.353 > 0.030
Positive Predictive Value 0.349 < 0.538
Total TP 83 > 7
Total TN 32265 < 32490
Total FP 165 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 0
Total FP INCONS 134 > 6
Total FP COMP 10 < 19
Total FN 152 < 228
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 32265
Total FP 165
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.346
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.374 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.349
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3UZL_B 0.36 0.35 0.38 13 3536 21 3 18 0 24
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 32490
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 228
Total Scores
MCC 0.125
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.078 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.030
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.