CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.346 > 0.090
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.374 ± 0.176 > 0.090 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.353 > 0.038
Positive Predictive Value 0.349 > 0.225
Total TP 83 > 9
Total TN 32265 < 32463
Total FP 165 > 32
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 2
Total FP INCONS 134 > 29
Total FP COMP 10 > 1
Total FN 152 < 226
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 32265
Total FP 165
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.346
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.374 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.349
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3UZL_B 0.36 0.35 0.38 13 3536 21 3 18 0 24
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 9
Total TN 32463
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 226
Total Scores
MCC 0.090
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.090 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.038
Positive Predictive Value 0.225
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.