CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) ContextFold
MCC 0.625 > 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.300 > 0.568 ± 0.278
Sensitivity 0.497 > 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.790 > 0.763
Total TP 83 > 74
Total TN 25788 < 25796
Total FP 33 < 37
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 2
Total FP INCONS 22 > 21
Total FP COMP 11 < 14
Total FN 84 < 93
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 25788
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.497
Positive Predictive Value 0.790
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 74
Total TN 25796
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.278
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.763
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.