Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
RNASLOpt |
| MCC |
0.625 |
>
|
0.467 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.581
±
0.300
|
>
|
0.514
±
0.309
|
| Sensitivity |
0.497 |
>
|
0.383 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.790 |
>
|
0.577 |
| Total TP |
83 |
>
|
64 |
| Total TN |
25788 |
>
|
25782 |
| Total FP |
33 |
<
|
53 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
<
|
11 |
| Total FP INCONS |
22 |
<
|
36 |
| Total FP COMP |
11 |
>
|
6 |
| Total FN |
84 |
<
|
103 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASLOpt).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASLOpt).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
83 |
| Total TN |
25788 |
| Total FP |
33 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
| Total FP INCONS |
22 |
| Total FP COMP |
11 |
| Total FN |
84 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.625 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.581
±
0.300
|
| Sensitivity |
0.497 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.790 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
64 |
| Total TN |
25782 |
| Total FP |
53 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
11 |
| Total FP INCONS |
36 |
| Total FP COMP |
6 |
| Total FN |
103 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.467 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.514
±
0.309
|
| Sensitivity |
0.383 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.577 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|