CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) CentroidFold
MCC 0.680 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134 > 0.558 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.551 > 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.843 > 0.679
Total TP 140 > 110
Total TN 33612 < 33616
Total FP 34 < 58
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 9
Total FP INCONS 23 < 43
Total FP COMP 8 > 6
Total FN 114 < 144
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 33612
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 110
Total TN 33616
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 144
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.679
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.