CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) HotKnots
MCC 0.680 > 0.518
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134 > 0.554 ± 0.222
Sensitivity 0.551 > 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.843 > 0.595
Total TP 140 > 116
Total TN 33612 > 33583
Total FP 34 < 91
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 11
Total FP INCONS 23 < 68
Total FP COMP 8 < 12
Total FN 114 < 138
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and HotKnots).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 33612
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 33583
Total FP 91
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 68
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 138
Total Scores
MCC 0.518
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.222
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.595
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 6 25 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.