CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) IPknot
MCC 0.680 > 0.551
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134 > 0.554 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.551 > 0.441
Positive Predictive Value 0.843 > 0.696
Total TP 140 > 112
Total TN 33612 < 33617
Total FP 34 < 55
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 7
Total FP INCONS 23 < 42
Total FP COMP 8 > 6
Total FN 114 < 142
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 33612
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 33617
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 142
Total Scores
MCC 0.551
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.441
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.