CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) MaxExpect
MCC 0.680 > 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134 > 0.432 ± 0.246
Sensitivity 0.551 > 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.843 > 0.547
Total TP 140 > 99
Total TN 33612 > 33597
Total FP 34 < 94
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 9
Total FP INCONS 23 < 73
Total FP COMP 8 < 12
Total FN 114 < 155
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MaxExpect).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 33612
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 99
Total TN 33597
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 155
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.432 ± 0.246
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 4 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.