CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.680 > 0.413
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134 > 0.385 ± 0.212
Sensitivity 0.551 > 0.358
Positive Predictive Value 0.843 > 0.484
Total TP 140 > 91
Total TN 33612 > 33590
Total FP 34 < 109
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 13
Total FP INCONS 23 < 84
Total FP COMP 8 < 12
Total FN 114 < 163
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 33612
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 33590
Total FP 109
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.413
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.385 ± 0.212
Sensitivity 0.358
Positive Predictive Value 0.484
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.