CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.665 > 0.575
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.167 > 0.601 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.519 > 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.859 > 0.709
Total TP 140 > 127
Total TN 34860 > 34844
Total FP 29 < 60
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 9
Total FP INCONS 23 < 43
Total FP COMP 6 < 8
Total FN 130 < 143
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 34860
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 130
Total Scores
MCC 0.665
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 34844
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 143
Total Scores
MCC 0.575
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.709
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.