CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.665 > 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.167 < 0.655 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.519 > 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.859 > 0.807
Total TP 140 > 134
Total TN 34860 > 34857
Total FP 29 < 41
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 5
Total FP INCONS 23 < 27
Total FP COMP 6 < 9
Total FN 130 < 136
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 34860
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 130
Total Scores
MCC 0.665
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 34857
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 136
Total Scores
MCC 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.655 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.807
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.