CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) MCFold
MCC 0.651 > 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.195 > 0.454 ± 0.202
Sensitivity 0.504 > 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.846 > 0.452
Total TP 115 > 108
Total TN 30516 > 30413
Total FP 26 < 149
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 18
Total FP INCONS 21 < 113
Total FP COMP 5 < 18
Total FN 113 < 120
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 30516
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.651
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.846
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 30413
Total FP 149
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 120
Total Scores
MCC 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.454 ± 0.202
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.