CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.642 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.179 > 0.584 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.494 > 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.839 > 0.703
Total TP 120 > 111
Total TN 31877 > 31862
Total FP 28 < 57
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 6
Total FP INCONS 23 < 41
Total FP COMP 5 < 10
Total FN 123 < 132
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 31877
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 123
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.494
Positive Predictive Value 0.839
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 31862
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.703
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.