CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots NanoFolder
MCC 0.404 > 0.366
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.207 > 0.390 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.360 < 0.376
Positive Predictive Value 0.461 > 0.364
Total TP 112 < 117
Total TN 41525 > 41447
Total FP 145 < 214
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 30
Total FP INCONS 120 < 174
Total FP COMP 14 > 10
Total FN 199 > 194
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 41525
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 120
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 199
Total Scores
MCC 0.404
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.360
Positive Predictive Value 0.461
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
2LKR_A - 0.44 0.44 0.45 17 6067 22 4 17 1 22
3J16_L 0.34 0.30 0.41 9 2753 13 0 13 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.26 0.22 0.32 8 3135 17 0 17 0 29
3UZL_B 0.75 0.59 0.96 22 3547 1 0 1 0 15
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 41447
Total FP 214
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 174
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.366
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.390 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.376
Positive Predictive Value 0.364
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.29 0.33 0.25 13 6054 38 8 30 0 26
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3U4M_B - 0.61 0.57 0.66 21 3128 11 1 10 0 16
3UZL_B 0.36 0.35 0.38 13 3536 21 3 18 0 24
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.