CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG RNASLOpt
MCC 0.506 > 0.443
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.485 ± 0.163 > 0.409 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.453 > 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.573 > 0.547
Total TP 181 > 146
Total TN 51761 < 51810
Total FP 147 > 130
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 15
Total FP INCONS 119 > 106
Total FP COMP 12 > 9
Total FN 219 < 254
P-value 2.91763127434e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 181
Total TN 51761
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 119
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 219
Total Scores
MCC 0.506
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.485 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.453
Positive Predictive Value 0.573
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.63 0.55 0.73 11 1525 4 1 3 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.73 0.69 0.77 27 6070 8 2 6 0 12
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 6183 27 2 23 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 146
Total TN 51810
Total FP 130
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 254
Total Scores
MCC 0.443
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.409 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.