CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.600 > 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.201 > 0.602 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.522 > 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 < 0.756
Total TP 141 > 127
Total TN 34820 < 34855
Total FP 74 > 53
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 3
Total FP INCONS 52 > 38
Total FP COMP 12 = 12
Total FN 129 < 143
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 141
Total TN 34820
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 129
Total Scores
MCC 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 34855
Total FP 53
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 143
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.756
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.