CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.513 > 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.172 > 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.457 > 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.584 > 0.538
Total TP 163 > 7
Total TN 42629 < 42895
Total FP 131 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 0
Total FP INCONS 98 > 6
Total FP COMP 15 < 19
Total FN 194 < 350
P-value 1.89649746203e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 42629
Total FP 131
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 98
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.584
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 42895
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 350
Total Scores
MCC 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.