CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Pknots
MCC 0.598 > 0.578
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.101 < 0.578 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.540 > 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.668 > 0.654
Total TP 541 > 517
Total TN 133493 < 133513
Total FP 314 > 304
Total FP CONTRA 41 > 35
Total FP INCONS 228 < 238
Total FP COMP 45 > 31
Total FN 461 < 485
P-value 1.34568509467e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Pknots).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 541
Total TN 133493
Total FP 314
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 228
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 461
Total Scores
MCC 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.540
Positive Predictive Value 0.668
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 5121 11 2 4 5 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 621 3 0 3 0 13
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.77 0.94 30 6073 4 0 2 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.27 0.27 0.28 9 6184 26 2 21 3 24
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 0 6 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 517
Total TN 133513
Total FP 304
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 238
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 485
Total Scores
MCC 0.578
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.654
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.67 0.58 0.79 23 5122 9 2 4 3 17
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
2LKR_A - 0.44 0.44 0.45 17 6067 22 4 17 1 22
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 2 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.36 0.36 12 6183 23 3 18 2 21
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J16_L 0.34 0.30 0.41 9 2753 13 0 13 0 21
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 1 5 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.55 0.50 0.62 13 1995 8 0 8 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.67 0.86 31 6985 8 1 4 3 15
3O58_2 0.83 0.74 0.93 28 7230 3 0 2 1 10
3O58_3 0.27 0.31 0.24 11 12357 38 11 24 3 24
3PDR_A 0.54 0.44 0.65 32 12831 19 0 17 2 40
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.26 0.22 0.32 8 3135 17 0 17 0 29
3UZL_B 0.75 0.59 0.96 22 3547 1 0 1 0 15
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.