CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt MCFold
MCC 0.461 > 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.416 ± 0.166 > 0.380 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.393 < 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.550 > 0.419
Total TP 126 < 152
Total TN 43907 > 43773
Total FP 112 < 247
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 36
Total FP INCONS 90 < 175
Total FP COMP 9 < 36
Total FN 195 > 169
P-value 2.14792285362e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and MCFold).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 43907
Total FP 112
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 195
Total Scores
MCC 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.416 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.550
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 152
Total TN 43773
Total FP 247
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 175
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 169
Total Scores
MCC 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.380 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.419
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.