CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.474 > 0.110
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.505 ± 0.158 > 0.117 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.374 > 0.047
Positive Predictive Value 0.609 > 0.267
Total TP 95 > 12
Total TN 33622 < 33733
Total FP 67 > 34
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 2
Total FP INCONS 50 > 31
Total FP COMP 6 > 1
Total FN 159 < 242
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 33622
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 159
Total Scores
MCC 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.505 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 12
Total TN 33733
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 242
Total Scores
MCC 0.110
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.117 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.047
Positive Predictive Value 0.267
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.