CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.644 > 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.076 > 0.603 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.499 > 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.834 < 0.953
Total TP 457 > 382
Total TN 191070 < 191217
Total FP 145 > 34
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 4
Total FP INCONS 71 > 15
Total FP COMP 54 > 15
Total FN 459 < 534
P-value 2.82781450476e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 457
Total TN 191070
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 459
Total Scores
MCC 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.834
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3GX2_A 0.74 0.55 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.47 0.32 0.69 42 70815 23 6 13 4 90
3IZF_C 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 6871 1 0 1 0 23
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 26 4 15 7 23
3JYX_3 0.58 0.44 0.75 12 6312 11 0 4 7 15
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.68 0.48 0.96 22 6998 4 1 0 3 24
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 18 2 8 8 23
3O58_2 0.79 0.71 0.87 27 7229 5 2 2 1 11
3PDR_A 0.70 0.53 0.93 38 12839 5 0 3 2 34
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 382
Total TN 191217
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 534
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.953
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.24 0.12 0.50 2 2846 4 0 2 2 15
2XQD_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 21
3A2K_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 51 70818 7 2 5 0 81
3IZF_C 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 6887 0 0 0 0 38
3JYV_7 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 26
3JYX_4 0.52 0.30 0.91 10 12235 3 0 1 2 23
3JYX_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 11 6315 5 0 2 3 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.71 0.54 0.93 25 6994 4 1 1 2 21
3O58_3 0.56 0.34 0.92 12 12390 1 0 1 0 23
3O58_2 0.65 0.42 1.00 16 7244 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.77 0.61 0.98 44 12835 3 0 1 2 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.