CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.637 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.641 ± 0.169 > 0.536 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.478 > 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.854 > 0.647
Total TP 129 > 123
Total TN 34872 > 34833
Total FP 38 < 74
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 7
Total FP INCONS 22 < 60
Total FP COMP 16 > 7
Total FN 141 < 147
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 129
Total TN 34872
Total FP 38
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.637
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.641 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.854
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 34833
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 147
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.647
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.