CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.648 > 0.232
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.077 > 0.195 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.504 > 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.837 > 0.563
Total TP 467 > 90
Total TN 191466 < 191864
Total FP 145 > 72
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 4
Total FP INCONS 71 > 66
Total FP COMP 54 > 2
Total FN 460 < 837
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 467
Total TN 191466
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 460
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.837
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3GX2_A 0.74 0.55 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.47 0.32 0.69 42 70815 23 6 13 4 90
3IZF_C 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 6871 1 0 1 0 23
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 26 4 15 7 23
3JYX_3 0.58 0.44 0.75 12 6312 11 0 4 7 15
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.68 0.48 0.96 22 6998 4 1 0 3 24
3O58_2 0.79 0.71 0.87 27 7229 5 2 2 1 11
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 18 2 8 8 23
3PDR_A 0.70 0.53 0.93 38 12839 5 0 3 2 34
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 191864
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 837
Total Scores
MCC 0.232
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.195 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.563
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2848 3 1 1 1 17
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2845 5 0 5 0 27
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2924 2 0 2 0 28
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3GX2_A 0.36 0.15 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 34
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3IZ4_A 0.21 0.08 0.59 10 70859 7 0 7 0 122
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6898 5 0 5 0 54
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 32
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12241 5 0 5 0 33
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6323 5 1 4 0 27
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7017 4 0 4 0 46
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7257 3 0 3 0 38
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12872 8 0 8 0 72
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.