CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Afold
MCC 0.540 > 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.262 < 0.592 ± 0.245
Sensitivity 0.415 < 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.582
Total TP 97 < 113
Total TN 46451 > 46394
Total FP 55 < 121
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 12
Total FP INCONS 36 < 69
Total FP COMP 15 < 40
Total FN 137 > 121
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 97
Total TN 46451
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 137
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.262
Sensitivity 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 46394
Total FP 121
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 121
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.592 ± 0.245
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.582
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.