CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.570 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.218 > 0.582 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.434 < 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.754 > 0.653
Total TP 95 < 98
Total TN 45183 > 45159
Total FP 46 < 94
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 9
Total FP INCONS 27 < 43
Total FP COMP 15 < 42
Total FN 124 > 121
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 45183
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.570
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 45159
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 121
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.653
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.74 0.58 0.95 18 2327 1 1 0 0 13
3JYX_4 0.33 0.30 0.37 10 12219 32 2 15 15 23
3O58_3 0.52 0.40 0.67 14 12382 17 2 5 10 21
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.