CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Mastr(20)
MCC 0.570 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.218 > 0.435 ± 0.388
Sensitivity 0.434 > 0.311
Positive Predictive Value 0.754 < 0.895
Total TP 95 > 68
Total TN 45183 < 45233
Total FP 46 > 8
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 2
Total FP INCONS 27 > 6
Total FP COMP 15 > 0
Total FN 124 < 151
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 45183
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.570
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 68
Total TN 45233
Total FP 8
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.435 ± 0.388
Sensitivity 0.311
Positive Predictive Value 0.895
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.