CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.546 > 0.510
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.226 > 0.534 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.409 < 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.734 > 0.575
Total TP 113 < 126
Total TN 50350 > 50285
Total FP 56 < 127
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 12
Total FP INCONS 37 < 81
Total FP COMP 15 < 34
Total FN 163 > 150
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 50350
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.409
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 50285
Total FP 127
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 81
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 150
Total Scores
MCC 0.510
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.575
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 31 3 16 12 23
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 33 1 21 11 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.