CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) MaxExpect
MCC 0.658 > 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.077 > 0.597 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.513 < 0.520
Positive Predictive Value 0.847 > 0.692
Total TP 470 < 476
Total TN 191063 > 190930
Total FP 118 < 278
Total FP CONTRA 20 < 29
Total FP INCONS 65 < 183
Total FP COMP 33 < 66
Total FN 446 > 440
P-value 4.98172311752e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and MaxExpect).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and MaxExpect).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 470
Total TN 191063
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 446
Total Scores
MCC 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.513
Positive Predictive Value 0.847
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.74 0.58 0.95 18 2327 1 1 0 0 13
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.35 0.82 46 70820 15 4 6 5 86
3IZF_C 0.71 0.59 0.86 32 6866 5 1 4 0 22
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 15 0 10 5 23
3JYX_3 0.60 0.52 0.70 14 6308 17 0 6 11 13
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3NPB_A 0.68 0.48 0.96 22 6998 3 1 0 2 24
3O58_3 0.37 0.26 0.53 9 12386 8 2 6 0 26
3O58_2 0.79 0.76 0.83 29 7225 7 3 3 1 9
3PDR_A 0.76 0.61 0.96 44 12834 3 0 2 1 28
3RKF_A 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2193 1 0 1 0 17
3SD1_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 25 3886 5 1 4 0 17
4A1C_3 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 7108 1 0 1 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 23 2 19 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 476
Total TN 190930
Total FP 278
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 183
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 440
Total Scores
MCC 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.520
Positive Predictive Value 0.692
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.54 0.46 0.64 61 70781 39 3 31 5 71
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 1 6 0 21
3JYV_7 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 2832 8 0 8 0 22
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 34 4 18 12 23
3JYX_3 0.64 0.63 0.65 17 6302 19 1 8 10 10
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.71 0.61 0.82 28 6987 9 0 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 35 2 20 13 23
3O58_2 0.75 0.76 0.74 29 7221 11 3 7 1 9
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 4 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.