CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.599 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.192 < 0.584 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.453 < 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.797 > 0.703
Total TP 110 < 111
Total TN 31882 > 31862
Total FP 31 < 57
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 6
Total FP INCONS 25 < 41
Total FP COMP 3 < 10
Total FN 133 > 132
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 110
Total TN 31882
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.599
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.453
Positive Predictive Value 0.797
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2193 1 0 1 0 17
3SD1_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 25 3886 5 1 4 0 17
4A1C_3 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 7108 1 0 1 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 23 2 19 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 31862
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.703
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.