CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.659 > 0.473
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.071 > 0.522 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.510 > 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.854 > 0.574
Total TP 502 > 387
Total TN 198817 > 198731
Total FP 121 < 337
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 31
Total FP INCONS 65 < 256
Total FP COMP 35 < 50
Total FN 482 < 597
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 502
Total TN 198817
Total FP 121
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 482
Total Scores
MCC 0.659
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.854
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 402 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3G4S_9 0.69 0.49 0.97 28 7352 3 1 0 2 29
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.74 0.58 0.95 18 2327 1 1 0 0 13
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.35 0.82 46 70820 15 4 6 5 86
3IZF_C 0.71 0.59 0.86 32 6866 5 1 4 0 22
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_3 0.60 0.52 0.70 14 6308 17 0 6 11 13
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 15 0 10 5 23
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3NPB_A 0.68 0.48 0.96 22 6998 3 1 0 2 24
3O58_2 0.79 0.76 0.83 29 7225 7 3 3 1 9
3O58_3 0.37 0.26 0.53 9 12386 8 2 6 0 26
3PDR_A 0.76 0.61 0.96 44 12834 3 0 2 1 28
3RKF_A 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2193 1 0 1 0 17
3SD1_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 25 3886 5 1 4 0 17
4A1C_3 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 7108 1 0 1 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 23 2 19 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 387
Total TN 198731
Total FP 337
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 256
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 597
Total Scores
MCC 0.473
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.522 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.574
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 12 5 3 4 8
2XQD_Y 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 7
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3AMU_B 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2983 7 0 5 2 12
3G4S_9 0.30 0.23 0.39 13 7348 20 1 19 0 44
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 0 9 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.36 0.31 0.43 41 70780 59 7 48 4 91
3IZF_C 0.69 0.56 0.86 30 6868 5 0 5 0 24
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2831 19 0 19 0 32
3JYX_3 0.60 0.56 0.65 15 6305 11 4 4 3 12
3JYX_4 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 12220 33 2 21 10 30
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.61 0.50 0.74 23 6990 9 0 8 1 23
3O58_2 0.47 0.42 0.53 16 7230 16 3 11 2 22
3O58_3 0.09 0.09 0.10 3 12373 35 5 22 8 32
3PDR_A 0.57 0.44 0.74 32 12837 13 0 11 2 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.