CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.505 > 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.468 ± 0.142 < 0.471 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.304 < 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.844 > 0.525
Total TP 184 < 263
Total TN 190969 > 190686
Total FP 43 < 276
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 41
Total FP INCONS 25 < 197
Total FP COMP 9 < 38
Total FN 422 > 343
P-value 1.64481516727e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 184
Total TN 190969
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 422
Total Scores
MCC 0.505
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.468 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.304
Positive Predictive Value 0.844
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3IYQ_A 0.38 0.21 0.69 20 60697 13 5 4 4 74
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.21 0.85 28 70843 5 1 4 0 104
3NPB_A 0.66 0.48 0.92 22 6997 3 1 1 1 24
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.68 0.46 1.00 33 12847 1 0 0 1 39
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 263
Total TN 190686
Total FP 276
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 197
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 343
Total Scores
MCC 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.471 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.525
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60618 83 20 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.