CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.505 > 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.468 ± 0.142 < 0.507 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.304 < 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.844 > 0.523
Total TP 184 < 273
Total TN 190969 > 190665
Total FP 43 < 287
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 50
Total FP INCONS 25 < 199
Total FP COMP 9 < 38
Total FN 422 > 333
P-value 3.06286140723e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 184
Total TN 190969
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 422
Total Scores
MCC 0.505
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.468 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.304
Positive Predictive Value 0.844
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3IYQ_A 0.38 0.21 0.69 20 60697 13 5 4 4 74
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.21 0.85 28 70843 5 1 4 0 104
3NPB_A 0.66 0.48 0.92 22 6997 3 1 1 1 24
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.68 0.46 1.00 33 12847 1 0 0 1 39
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 273
Total TN 190665
Total FP 287
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 333
Total Scores
MCC 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.523
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60616 85 22 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.