CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.591 > 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.114 > 0.570 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.381 < 0.423
Positive Predictive Value 0.923 > 0.714
Total TP 72 < 80
Total TN 24802 > 24768
Total FP 9 < 42
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 3
Total FP INCONS 4 < 29
Total FP COMP 3 < 10
Total FN 117 > 109
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 72
Total TN 24802
Total FP 9
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.591
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.381
Positive Predictive Value 0.923
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 24768
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.423
Positive Predictive Value 0.714
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.