CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAfold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAfold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.549 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.214 > 0.548 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.496 > 0.409
Positive Predictive Value 0.612 < 0.734
Total TP 137 > 113
Total TN 50280 < 50350
Total FP 121 > 56
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 4
Total FP INCONS 74 > 37
Total FP COMP 34 > 15
Total FN 139 < 163
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAfold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAfold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 137
Total TN 50280
Total FP 121
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 139
Total Scores
MCC 0.549
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.214
Sensitivity 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.612
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.32 10 12215 33 5 16 12 23
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 50350
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.409
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.