CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes Multilign(20)
MCC 0.555 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.183 > 0.536 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.470 > 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.661 > 0.647
Total TP 127 > 123
Total TN 34831 < 34833
Total FP 79 > 74
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 7
Total FP INCONS 54 < 60
Total FP COMP 14 > 7
Total FN 143 < 147
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 34831
Total FP 79
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 143
Total Scores
MCC 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.661
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 5 25 11 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 34833
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 147
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.647
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.