CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.544 > 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.177 > 0.510 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.464 > 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.646 > 0.642
Total TP 122 > 111
Total TN 33371 < 33387
Total FP 79 > 72
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 8
Total FP INCONS 56 > 54
Total FP COMP 12 > 10
Total FN 141 < 152
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 33371
Total FP 79
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.646
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 5 25 11 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 33387
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.