CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Multilign(20)
MCC 0.551 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.184 > 0.536 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.474 > 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.646 < 0.647
Total TP 128 > 123
Total TN 34825 < 34833
Total FP 82 > 74
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 7
Total FP INCONS 60 = 60
Total FP COMP 12 > 7
Total FN 142 < 147
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 34825
Total FP 82
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 142
Total Scores
MCC 0.551
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.646
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 34833
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 147
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.647
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.