CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.500 > 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.169 > 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.429 > 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.591 > 0.538
Total TP 153 > 7
Total TN 42649 < 42895
Total FP 118 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 0
Total FP INCONS 93 > 6
Total FP COMP 12 < 19
Total FN 204 < 350
P-value 1.89649746203e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 153
Total TN 42649
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 204
Total Scores
MCC 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.591
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.41 0.37 0.48 11 2752 12 1 11 0 19
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 42895
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 350
Total Scores
MCC 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.