CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf Alterna
MCC 0.502 > 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.431 ± 0.205 < 0.431 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.458 > 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.562 < 0.590
Total TP 104 > 98
Total TN 19648 < 19667
Total FP 85 > 70
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 10
Total FP INCONS 73 > 58
Total FP COMP 4 > 2
Total FN 123 < 129
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Alterna).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 19648
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 123
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.431 ± 0.205
Sensitivity 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.562
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 19667
Total FP 70
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 129
Total Scores
MCC 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.431 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.590
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.