CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf RDfolder
MCC 0.414 > 0.302
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.370 ± 0.150 > 0.239 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.378 > 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.468 > 0.434
Total TP 102 > 59
Total TN 23017 < 23099
Total FP 120 > 80
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 7
Total FP INCONS 106 > 70
Total FP COMP 4 > 3
Total FN 168 < 211
P-value 1.42300079339e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 102
Total TN 23017
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 168
Total Scores
MCC 0.414
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.370 ± 0.150
Sensitivity 0.378
Positive Predictive Value 0.468
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 59
Total TN 23099
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 211
Total Scores
MCC 0.302
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.239 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.434
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.