CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.575 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.600 ± 0.205 > 0.548 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.478 > 0.409
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 < 0.734
Total TP 132 > 113
Total TN 50314 < 50350
Total FP 83 > 56
Total FP CONTRA 6 > 4
Total FP INCONS 52 > 37
Total FP COMP 25 > 15
Total FN 144 < 163
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 132
Total TN 50314
Total FP 83
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 144
Total Scores
MCC 0.575
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.600 ± 0.205
Sensitivity 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 50350
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.409
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.