CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold RNAshapes
MCC 0.574 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.067 > 0.531 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.480 > 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.691 > 0.622
Total TP 900 > 882
Total TN 338691 > 338576
Total FP 466 < 618
Total FP CONTRA 58 < 75
Total FP INCONS 344 < 460
Total FP COMP 64 < 83
Total FN 975 < 993
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 900
Total TN 338691
Total FP 466
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 344
Total FP COMP 64
Total FN 975
Total Scores
MCC 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.89 0.79 1.00 31 6074 1 0 0 1 8
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2WW9_F - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 290 3 0 3 0 3
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 2 0 1 1 9
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.62 0.55 0.70 21 4156 9 0 9 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.44 0.39 0.50 11 2679 11 2 9 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.69 0.63 0.76 22 3211 7 1 6 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.51 0.39 0.69 22 7349 10 1 9 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 22 4348 2 0 1 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.34 0.32 32 60627 71 19 48 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.42 0.65 56 70790 31 3 27 1 76
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 0 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.33 0.39 11 6188 19 2 15 2 22
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1222 3 0 3 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2834 16 0 16 0 32
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 19 1 10 8 10
3KTW_C - 0.74 0.63 0.87 27 4529 5 2 2 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.69 0.95 42 9136 3 0 2 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.54 0.78 14 1998 4 0 4 0 12
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.91 30 6988 6 1 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 11 3 7 1 10
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.85 40 12833 9 0 7 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.51 0.32 0.80 12 3555 3 2 1 0 25
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 882
Total TN 338576
Total FP 618
Total FP CONTRA 75
Total FP INCONS 460
Total FP COMP 83
Total FN 993
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.531 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.59 0.59 0.59 10 2833 12 4 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.16 0.12 0.25 3 1941 9 4 5 0 23
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2830 5 0 5 0 12
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 3460 23 0 23 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.69 0.63 0.77 17 2463 5 1 4 0 10
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.76 0.65 0.89 24 3628 3 0 3 0 13
3ADB_C - 0.67 0.61 0.74 23 4155 8 0 8 0 15
3AKZ_H 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2679 6 1 4 1 11
3AM1_B - 0.64 0.60 0.70 21 3210 9 1 8 0 14
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.41 0.32 0.53 18 7347 16 1 15 0 39
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.76 0.63 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 22 4253 3 0 3 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.26 0.28 0.24 26 60619 83 21 60 2 68
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.60 60 70776 45 6 34 5 72
3IZF_C 0.59 0.52 0.68 28 6862 13 1 12 0 26
3J0L_2 - 0.38 0.36 0.40 12 6186 20 3 15 2 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3KTW_C - 0.39 0.35 0.45 15 4527 19 1 17 1 28
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NDB_M - 0.82 0.72 0.94 44 9133 4 0 3 1 17
3NKB_B - 0.61 0.54 0.70 14 1996 6 0 6 0 12
3NPB_A 0.77 0.63 0.94 29 6990 4 1 1 2 17
3O58_2 0.60 0.61 0.59 23 7221 18 4 12 2 15
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3PDR_A 0.67 0.56 0.80 40 12830 12 0 10 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.39 0.32 0.48 12 3545 13 2 11 0 25
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 5 25 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.